Districts and charter schools at present know how they'd brand out under Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed Local Control Funding Formula, his programme for sweeping school finance reform. The state Department of Finance posted the long-awaited district-by-district breakdown and a ii-page overview Wednesday. The 80-folio nautical chart calculates districts' base per student funding for 2011-12 as a comparison and lists funding for the next two years and full per pupil funding in seven years – if projected state revenues hold upwards.

Brown outlines increases in education spending in a news conference last month.

Brown outlines increases in education spending in a news briefing terminal month.

Dark-brown's proposed formula promises to simplify and rationalize the state's idiosyncratic and irrational funding system, with its complex rules governing dozens of "categorical" programs with funding designated for special purposes. Starting off with what districts now receive in base funding (known as "revenue limit" funding), it would create a new financing system as additional coin becomes available from increased revenues generated past an improving state economy, and past debts that the state owes to schools are paid off.

Brown's programme would provide additional funds to districts having to meet the actress costs of educating economically disadvantaged and other loftier-needs students. At that place would be a "phase in" flow, with annual funding increases, leading to full funding in 2019-twenty. The Legislature, which reacted cooly last twelvemonth to an earlier version, must now consider whether to approve or modify information technology.

Under the program, no district would receive less than they receive this year in state support, and "the vast majority" – ane,700 districts and charter schools – will become "moderate to pregnant" funding increases over the adjacent 5 years, according to the overview. During this time, the average per-student funding under Proposition 98 is projected to rise $2,700 per student.*  Receiving niggling or no increase in money would be 230 lease schools and districts – among them "basic aid" districts that already receive more in funding from holding taxes than they would be entitled to in state funding.

The formula would work this way:

  • Every commune would receive a base of operations grant for every pupil – an average of $6,800 when fully funded, with more than for loftier schools and less for elementary schools. The base  grant would include restoring the dollars the state owed to districts from past years' budget cuts and unpaid cost-of-living increases. Information technology would non include money for special education and a few other categorical programs that would be funded outside of the formula. No district, including bones assist districts, would receive less than they get today. Schools would get an extra $700 per student in grades K-three for smaller classes, though districts could spend the money otherwise.

Districts with disadvantaged students – low-income students, English learners and foster youth – would get additional dollars:

  • A supplement of $2,385 per educatee, which is equal to 35 pct of the base of operations grant for every disadvantaged pupil in the district.
  • An additional grant for those districts in which high-needs students comprise fifty per centum or more than of students, reflecting the demand for additional money to annul the demands on districts with a high concentration of poor children and English learners. Districts with 60 percent high-needs students would get 38.5 percent more than revenue per high-needs student ($ii,624); a district in which every child is an English language learner or low-income student would become a maximum of 52.5 percent more than ($iii,578) in per-student funding than a district with no loftier-needs children.

Looking at  how the formula volition play out  in Orange Canton (pages 39-twoscore):

  • Magnolia Uncomplicated Schoolhouse Commune in Anaheim has 6,142 students, 73 pct of whom are low-income students and 49 percent of whom are English learners. Its base of operations grant of $half-dozen,122 last year would ascent to $11,190 per student when fully funded by the state equally projected in seven years.
  • Los Alamitos Unified, with nine,343 students, got well-nigh the same base grant last year as Magnolia: $6,132. But, with merely 12 percent depression-income students and ii percent English learners, its funding would rise to only $8,616 per student at total funding, $2,574 less than in Magnolia.
  • Laguna Beach Unified, with ii,878 students, is a "basic help" district, with enough income from property taxes from high-priced homes to generate an enviable $13,362 per student without whatever additional support from the state. It wouldn't lose whatever money under Brown's formula, but it wouldn't gain any either.

Although the formula for when the plan is fully implemented is pretty straightforward and simple, determining funding during the  phase-in period would be anything only. That's because each district's starting signal is different, reflecting differences amid districts' current revenue limit funding and funding from categorical programs. The charge per unit of yearly increases, to get to the fully-funded target amount, would exist quicker for low-funded districts and slower for those already getting above-boilerplate funding.

A comparison of Los Angeles Unified (folio 23) and Fresno Unified (page 10) is illustrative. Based on Section of Finance calculations, Fresno, the fourth-largest district in the state, received $6,547 per pupil in the equivalent of base of operations funding under the formula last year. Los Angeles Unified got $7,509 in base funding, nearly $i,000 more than per student than Fresno, because of funding from a categorical program – desegregation money at present called TIIG (Targeted Instructional Comeback Block Grant) – that Fresno never got, and Los Angeles will continue to receive, even though they serve roughly the same proportions of high-demand students. At full funding, both Los Angeles Unified and Fresno Unified would get shut to the same amount: $11,635 for Fresno, $11,993 for Los Angeles. Over the next 2 years, Fresno would become $968 more per educatee; Los Angeles would get $830 more per educatee.

The Department of Finance overview doesn't detail the formula for determining the amounts that districts will get each year as this program is phased in: it's circuitous. Consult your district's primary finance officer or, if you lot're ambitious, it's spelled out in the 500-page trailer bill on Brown's proposed funding formula.

* The Department of Finance doesn't make projections beyond 5 years; it uses what is describes as "conservative" Suggestion 98 forecasts beyond that.

To get more reports similar this one, click here to sign upwards for EdSource's no-price daily email on latest developments in teaching.